USDT live
Supply 112.4B +0.8%
Tron share 53.2%
ETH share 38.4%
TRC20 gas $0.95 -2.1%
ERC20 gas $4.20
24h volume $48.2B
English · 中文

$70M USDT Frozen by Tether: Is Your U-Card Balance Safe Under the On-Chain Blacklist?

2026-06-13

Roughly $70 million worth of USDT was frozen by Tether, in what appears to be linked to an exploit. According to CriptoNoticias’s report, the related on-chain activity also coincided with Monero (XMR) briefly spiking to $440 late on June 11 into the early hours of June 12. The freeze was executed directly by Tether at the issuer level—meaning the USDT corresponding to blacklisted addresses effectively became “dead coins”: untransferable and unredeemable. This isn’t an action by an exchange or a specific card—it’s the contract-level control a stablecoin issuer holds over its own token.

What This Means for USDT Card Users

Let’s start with the conclusion: this freeze occurred at the on-chain issuer level and has no direct connection to any virtual card issuance channel. If your USDT has already been loaded into a card account and converted into spendable fiat balance, or if the funds in your wallet have a clean origin, this event doesn’t touch you. What got frozen were specific suspicious addresses, not USDT network-wide.

What U-card users should really take away is the underlying fact this event exposes: USDT balances can be unilaterally frozen by Tether at any time, without a court order and without advance notice. This logic applies to any card funded with USDT—whether you’re using our editorially selected MPCard Asia Elite variant or Bybit Card.

Broken down by time window:

To learn how to reduce this kind of risk before topping up, see our What Is a U-Card basics guide.

Historical Comparison: How Is This Different From 2022 and 2023

Tether freezing addresses isn’t news. In 2022, after Tornado Cash was sanctioned by U.S. OFAC, Tether initially refused to proactively freeze related addresses, citing the lack of a formal request from law enforcement—it later complied with freezes over time. In 2023, Tether froze several hundred million dollars in addresses linked to fraud and money laundering in one action, publicly cooperating with a U.S. Department of Justice operation.

What’s different this time is the triggering scenario: previous freezes were mostly tied to sanctions compliance or anti-fraud cooperation, while this one is directly linked to a suspected exploit, accompanied by unusual Monero price movement—Monero, due to its privacy features, is commonly used as an exit route for “cleaning” funds. What stays consistent is this: Tether holds contract-level freeze power, and it uses it. This is fundamentally different in nature from the 2023 USDC brief de-peg event—that was a redemption confidence crisis triggered by the collapse of a reserve bank (Silicon Valley Bank), and the coin itself was never frozen; USDT freezes target specific addresses, representing the issuer proactively exercising its authority, not market panic.

For U-card users, the conclusion is consistent: a stablecoin’s “stability” refers to price, not to being “unfreezable.”

Tether’s freeze power is written into its terms of service, an explicitly reserved right of the issuer, and currently sits in a legally clearly permitted gray zone—no major jurisdiction prohibits a stablecoin issuer from freezing its own token. The EU’s MiCAR framework (being phased in since 2024) imposes reserve, redemption, and transparency requirements on stablecoin issuers, but likewise does not strip issuers of the ability to freeze funds involved in incidents.

For readers using USDT cards in the EU, we recommend first reading our EU Compliance Guide to understand how responsibilities are divided between EMTs (Electronic Money Tokens) and card issuers under MiCAR. Put simply: the card issuer is responsible for your card’s fiat balance, and Tether is responsible for on-chain USDT—these are two separate accountability systems. The freeze happened on Tether’s end, and it does not obligate your card issuer to “repay on Tether’s behalf.” But it also means that if your deposit funds get frozen on-chain before they land, the card issuer is equally powerless to help.

Milestones Worth Watching Next

  1. Tether’s official announcement: Whether the specific addresses and reasons behind this $70 million freeze will be disclosed on the transparency page. The speed of transparency disclosure is key to judging whether this is routine or a major event.
  2. How quickly Monero’s price retreats: If $440 was driven by a short-term exodus of exploit funds, the price usually gives it back quickly. If it stays elevated, that’s a sign funds may still be moving.
  3. Whether law enforcement follows up: If agencies like the FBI or Europol issue statements, it signals this event has escalated in severity and could trigger broader address flagging.
  4. Whether more addresses get caught up: Tether freezes often have a ripple effect—downstream addresses that have transacted with flagged addresses may face additional freezes within days.

Editorial Recommendations

One final point worth stressing: that USDT can be frozen is a fact that has long existed and will continue to exist—it’s not a new risk. Treating it as common knowledge is far more useful than getting anxious about any one specific freeze event.