USDT live
Supply 112.4B +0.8%
Tron share 53.2%
ETH share 38.4%
TRC20 gas $0.95 -2.1%
ERC20 gas $4.20
24h volume $48.2B
English · 中文

CLARITY Act Clears the Senate Banking Committee, but Three Hurdles Remain — What It Means for USDT Card Users

2026-05-23

Core Facts

The U.S. CLARITY Act (Digital Asset Market Structure Act) passed the Senate Banking Committee on May 14, 2026, with a vote of 15 in favor and 9 against, formally advancing from committee to a full Senate floor vote. This marks the first meaningful progress for the bill in roughly 10 months since it passed the House in July 2025 with bipartisan support of 294 to 134. Crypto venture firm MEXC Ventures noted in its latest report that committee passage is only a prelude — the bill’s true fate hinges on three hurdles: the 60-vote threshold for a full Senate vote, bipartisan conflict over a clause preventing the president and executive officials from holding crypto interests, and reconciliation with a parallel bill from the Senate Agriculture Committee. According to Tokenpost’s report, if any one of these stalls, the probability of the bill becoming law before the 2026 midterm elections drops significantly.

Editorial Take · Practical Impact on USDT Card Users

The core of the CLARITY Act is to clearly classify digital assets under two regulatory frameworks — CFTC (commodities) and SEC (securities) — and to establish an independent compliance pathway for stablecoin issuers. For USDT virtual card users, this has no direct short-term impact, but it will transmit effects along two dimensions over the medium to long term:

First, card issuers’ policies on U.S. addresses / U.S. IPs / U.S. BINs may tighten or loosen further. Currently, the US Direct variant of MPCard is already suspended, and Coinbase Card issuance within the U.S. has long been affected by the SEC and state regulators. If the CLARITY Act passes within 2026, the CFTC-led “digital commodity” pathway would give USD-pegged stablecoins like USDT a clearer legal standing in cross-border payment settlement — meaning issuers would have room to relaunch U.S.-region products. If the bill stalls, the current status quo (Asia-Pacific routes dominant) will continue.

Second, cards held by Asia-Pacific users are not affected. Products using Asia-Pacific accounts + Asia-Pacific BINs + Asia-Pacific IPs — such as MPCard Asia Elite, Bybit Card, and OKX Card — run on clearing pathways outside U.S. SEC/CFTC jurisdiction. This legislative development does not change their availability. Within 7, 30, or even 90 days, ordinary users will see no change to charges, subscriptions, or limits because of this news.

If you are a user concerned about whether direct U.S.-region card issuance can return, refer to the card issuance region breakdown in our 2026 Comprehensive Top 5.

Historical Comparison

Placing this legislative progress on a timeline makes it easier to gauge its “real speed”:

Regulatory Compliance Implications

The goal of the CLARITY Act is precisely to eliminate the current legal gray areas. The current U.S. status for crypto payment cards is: not explicitly prohibited, but issuers must apply for Money Services Business (MSB) licenses in each state individually, plus federal FinCEN registration. This combination of high compliance costs and regulatory uncertainty is the fundamental reason direct U.S.-region card issuance has retreated over the past 18 months.

If you are a user based in the United States, we recommend tracking updates to the U.S. Compliance Guide — we will publish a full refresh when the bill reaches a full Senate vote. For users outside the U.S. who hold a U.S. address, the most stable path at present remains Asia-Pacific route virtual cards. See What Is a U Card for an explanation of route differences.

Key Milestones Worth Watching

  1. June–July 2026: Whether the full Senate schedules debate and a vote. If nothing is on the agenda by end of July, the probability of legislation passing this year drops sharply.
  2. Revised version of the presidential conflict-of-interest clause: Democrats are pushing to include a provision barring the sitting president and immediate family from holding or issuing crypto assets; Republicans oppose it. Without resolving this, reaching 60 votes is nearly impossible.
  3. Progress of the Senate Agriculture Committee’s parallel bill: Expanding CFTC jurisdiction requires merging the Agriculture Committee version with the Banking Committee version — the window for this is Q3 2026.
  4. U.S. midterm elections in November 2026: If legislation is not completed before the elections, the new Congress will need to restart the process, pushing the overall timeline back by 12–18 months.

Editorial Recommendations